Give the voices back server 106

At a time when servers are dying off and ppl are crying out for activity especially on wc I think mutes should be lifted and give ppl a second chance!there's a player on server 106 called warrior13 who although can be annoying is quite amusing and alot of fun on wc so I feel he should be given his voice back just like many others should be! I'd like ppl to please leave there opinions in reply to this post and also comment on any other players you'd like to see get they're voices back.

if they were chat ban they deserved it.they wony lift it cuz of a dying server

if they were chat ban they deserved it.they wony lift it cuz of a dying server

Yeah unmuting one person isnt going to fix the activity of your servers world chat... Its between him and support. They dont chat ban unless they have a good reason. Players are given every opportunity to prevent this from happening.

It is incredibly difficult to get a chat ban. You almost have to really try to get muted for it to happen. Nonetheless, he shouldn't have the chat ban lifted. It's highly unlikely that one person can start up wc, and even in the event of that, it's usually because they spark some sort of controversy constantly. Also, people have different definitions of "amusement". If he got chat banned it certainly wasn't appropriate humor or amusement.

Warrior13 is the only one that keeps wc going... half the time wc is dead. warr seems to keep it alive. i say vote yes to warrior13 being unbanned

I understand the points made above but warrior13 was never malicious or anything.the ban was actually brought on by a overzealous "16" yr old boy expert not an adult.there's a reason experts are supposed to 18 because they're more emotionally mature and capable of rationalising situations so in my opinion the ban should not stand.

ummm expert title aint easy to get support picks who they deem is worthy.if he got expert he deserved it.and again support only chat bans for reason or after 3 mutes.

you make a valid point jewzaku however i believe all bans should be reviewed and that if it is viable a second chance should be given to the player here in order to prove himself. if however he does not behave himself the ban should be reimplemented. people deserve second chances. we all do.

you make a valid point jewzaku however i believe all bans should be reviewed and that if it is viable a second chance should be given to the player here in order to prove himself. if however he does not behave himself the ban should be reimplemented. people deserve second chances. we all do.

That does make alot of sense actually. I like the idea of reviewing each case, I really hope that haypi has the time to implement something like that. As long as experts were very on top of monitoring the new second chance recievers I dont see why that couldnt happen.

you make a valid point jewzaku however i believe all bans should be reviewed and that if it is viable a second chance should be given to the player here in order to prove himself. if however he does not behave himself the ban should be reimplemented. people deserve second chances. we all do.

Just throwing in the fact that this is not the first time warr has been banned. He was banned shortly after the merge, came back, and now has been banned again