Troops at Forts and Oasis - Suggestion

I know that probably this is going to be a stupid sugestion, but everybody knows how much cost to built a decent army.

Otherwise troops at forts and oasis are built so quickly, and I do not know you guys but I always think the same when I attached an oasis or fort: "What a waste of troops" meaning the amount of troops I kill and how much resources I will need to built that kind of army.

Maybe for future game updates, there can be a posibility of some kind of "Surrender" and we can get a little portion of those troops and include them in our own army.

What do you think guys?

dinerete

No. Just no. Obvious reasons.

What is obvious to one player may not be obvious to another.

I say no also. Right now the only thing that limits how fast an army can be raised is the amount of people it out of your main building. If you could "farm" your armies you could build ridiculously large armies in a ridiculously short amount of time.

No it wouldn't help at all.

If you could "farm" your armies you could build ridiculously large armies in a ridiculously short amount of time.

Also the large amount of time to build troops. That's usually what stops me... although if one had coins one could speed up time.
This idea seems pretty unbalancing to the game in a whole.. surrender could upturn and add to armies too easily

If you could "farm" your armies you could build ridiculously large armies in a ridiculously short amount of time.

Also the large amount of time to build troops. That's usually what stops me... although if one had coins one could speed up time.
This idea seems pretty unbalancing to the game in a whole.. surrender could upturn and add to armies too easily

if one had coins one could speed up time.

speed up time.

Pardon me koarandy?
I meant you could speed up troop training time with coins, not speed up time in general...

Hi guys,

I know all your points. I just wanted to point out a thought knowing that it would not be easy to implement.

Maybe Haypi thinkers can come out with something that not distrub the game, imagine that you can "surrender" a 5% of the people you have at that moment available for builing, taking in mind also your resources.

I am sure that there can be ways, there always are.

dinerete

No. Just no. Obvious reasons.

Don’t be cheeky, everyone is entitled to there own suggestions.

Back on topic:

Suggestions just go in the suggestion section.

I think surrendering is a bad idea as it could be abused, the reason the numbers are that high is so that you have a big enough army to kill them, surrendering would just defeat the purpose.

i do not support this either for the same sentiments as caladan