Suggestions

1. First suggestion- Give alliances the ability switch their leader without deleting the alliance. This is more important now as alliance rank and army would start over if the alliance wants to switch leaders. Ex. To do this the alliance leader Awould select an option once clicking on a vice in ranks. A letter of confirmation is sent and once that is done the change is made.
2. Alliance Members Fund- This is basically a donation fund for the whole alliance. Deposite Money, Resources, Coins, and Equipment/Treasure here. Everyone can view this but only leaders can distribute it. A member sends in an application for what they need and an alliance leader confirms or denies it. Much easier than risking on market. If not this I recommend some sort of private alliance trade and something that allows members of an alliance to transfer coins to one another. (Not while in a battle) Cheers,
-Big

1. Could be useful, pretty sure it's been suggested before

2. In case you haven't noticed, 3.0 has a donation box, where an alliance donates resources, coins, money. The players don't get these items tho, the alliance does. I'm pretty sure alliance trading has been knocked down by haypi themselves, so your 2nd idea will never happen

I support number 1... for number 2 alliance trading was declined. Too many ways to abuse it

Definately agree with number 1. Think about it... what if your alliance has built up a ton of prestige, and then it happens your leader goes inactive (this being a little while before the merge). If it so happens the leader does not come back, then when the merge happens, the leaders account would then be deleted and would break apart the alliance itself. Being able to switch leaders would definately be useful, but question is how?

For number 2, I disagree. In that case, it could be abused. Although it may not for a large alliance, it would not be necessary either to pass around resources that could be easily farmed or traded for a small amount of money.

I agree with Def she is definitly right the 1 idea is great 2 idea would get abused.

Or it could be like a vice can start the vote and its an alliance letter with a yes or no. You check it an it sends it away. When there are 26 yes the vice becomes leader and the leader becomes vice. this now prevents an inactive leader before the merge from not doing this inturn causing an alliance destruction.

1. That sounds like a good idea and could be very useful at sometimes

2.there is already a donation box but if only the leader could spend the money coins and resources that wouldn't be great cuss what if the leader went on vaction. The alliance wouldn't be able to train troops and not get mines as easy

Or it could be like a vice can start the vote and its an alliance letter with a yes or no. You check it an it sends it away. When there are 26 yes the vice becomes leader and the leader becomes vice. this now prevents an inactive leader before the merge from not doing this inturn causing an alliance destruction.

In my opinion it should be more than 26 votes...

U should have the whole alliance agree.

i reckon a 80% agreement should be enough