FAQ  •  Register  •  Login

Common Consensus

<<

Koldfyngrz

Newbie

Posts: 6

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:59 am

Post Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:05 am

Common Consensus

Hi :). I have of late become concerned about a small problem that I can see turning into a significant one. I'll try to keep this post like a skirt as someone I respect thinks it should be :)

Consider these factors:
1) there is an increasing need for experts as haypi itself increases. Subsequently hasty decisions could be made which could lead to ill chosen experts.
2) many of the experts we now have are quite young and may have seemed like good choices for experts at the time of their approval but it seems a legitimate concern that these young ones may not be mature or learned enough to properly handle the full responsibilities of being an expert.
3) quite frankly the current set of rules is a mess. It is a  mismatched, disunified , hodgepodge of good intentions but it has no common purpose, single vision, or, in all sincerity, any true effectiveness. The real problem I see lies with the rules, not the young or ill chosen experts. Why? Because the rules can be miss interpreted, abused, and too strictly enforced. The cycle can't perpetuate if the rules are fixed (young or ill chosen experts are beside the point once the rules are fixed).

What do these factors lead to and what could they lead to in the future? Simply put: tyrants, but I'm not entirely known for leaving things simply put… I would classify these "tyrannic experts" as such because of a prominent developing problem (there are a few more minor ones but I think that addressing this one will pretty well fix the others). I could give many examples but I'm trying to keep this short and already failing. The basic problem is that the forum/server rules are in place to keep things polite and civilized but with the factors I presented earlier they are being overly enforced to the point where people who otherwise wouldn't are beginning to rebel against them. Subsequently this becomes a vicious self perpetuating cycle in which people rebel against the "tyrant" and the expert, through lack if understanding or maturity, feels that the only way to fix the "problem" is to be more strict and mute people more swiftly. Thus the noose tightens on itself till world chat has been hung.

It's obvious support has become aware if the problem because admins have been in world chat a lot more recently and we have even had an expert from another server transferred to our server. I think, though, that the way to fix this is by revamping the rules. The biggest change I would insitute would be what I would call a "common consensus" rule that not only recommends but urges experts to wave some of the minor rules under certain circumstances. The basic idea is that if there is a majority of people respectfully disagreeing with the expert on his/her "interpretation/enforcement" that he/she should waive the rule (albeit obvious major offenses like extremely vulgar language).

Also I think that someone should take a close look at the rules and see what can be done about making them more unified in their proper purpose.

So there you go peoples. Please tell your friends about this. Every opinion counts! I really think it would be good for the people high up on the totem pole to consider this so the more attention it gets the better :) thnx!

-Kold
Last edited by Koldfyngrz on Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kall me Kold with a kapital K.
<<

Kvathe

Newbie

Posts: 8

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:19 pm

Location: Oregon

Post Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:46 am

Re: Common Consensus

Yeah! I was thinking that myself! When everybody is happy with your long emoji ad, why should you get muted for it? And btw, you spelled waive wrong kold :D
<<

Fey

User avatar

Baron

Posts: 159

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:03 am

Location: Seattle, WA

Post Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:08 am

Re: Common Consensus

No offense kold. But I think this is just one long complaint about an expert in our server. Yes I believe the rules might do well to be specified a bit, but this post itself and the way it's worded just sounds like a complaint

The rules are general because if they were specified, people would find loopholes saying, "Oh this isn't bashing because it doesn't say I can't call names"

The rules are made so experts can interprete them the way they see fit. Because each situation is different, and experts as real life people have been deemed to make that choice.

Specifically if an expert or mod does see this, kold has a specific issue in our server with emoji ads. He has directly asked for the specific rules on them various times, I was wondering if anyone could clear that up.

I was informed by sylarius that it cannot be over a page and the emoji ad/spam must be for an alliance or it is not allowed.
Can this be confirmed or dissuaded?
Image
<<

Koldfyngrz

Newbie

Posts: 6

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:59 am

Post Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:28 am

Re: Common Consensus

Thank you fey. Yes to a certain extent it is a complaint but that negates nothing of what I said. Yes I have had issues but…well I'm just a bit of a slow stubborn learner. I am trying to be more mature about this whole thing and have shortened my ads and as long as things remain as they are I will keep them short. I do have concerns about this problem becoming larger and even you must admit that the strictness does create unnecessary rebellions. If my idea proves itself useless/faulty (which I am sure it will) then thus is my lot. It's no biggie. I have become a lot less "riled" up about this issue so I won't have a fit or anything. Mostly I'm just interested in peoples thoughts and if it goes far enough that the people who really matter get in on it then great but whatever the outcome I'll be satisfied. Again thanks for your thoughts. -Kold
Kall me Kold with a kapital K.
<<

Koldfyngrz

Newbie

Posts: 6

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:59 am

Post Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:34 am

Re: Common Consensus

Kvathe wrote:Yeah! I was thinking that myself! When everybody is happy with your long emoji ad, why should you get muted for it? And btw, you spelled waive wrong kold :D

There it's fixed kvathe "waive" :)
Kall me Kold with a kapital K.

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.