Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:11 pm by Kcmathews
Honestly, this idea at first glance seems like a really BAD idea. BUT, when you think about it a little more, I actually really like the idea.
First - Whoever buys the troops would get no Pres from building them.
Second - The person selling the troops still has to support them with crops and can not use them in battle if they are on the market.
For those of you who think that this would hurt the resource market, think again. I buy a lot of resources on the market to build troops, then suicide them into a fort and rebuild. Instead of Suiciding them, I could turn around and sell them and make back more money to buy more resources from the market.
As far as changing the make-up of Forts, I don't think that would be needed, as long as they set a Min Price for each unit on the market. Min Price would need to be high enough so Low Levels couldn't buy a huge army out the gate. Example( Inf = 12gp, Cav = 50gp, Archer = 25gp, Cat = 100gp). Those would be the Min Rates. People could definitely sell them for more.
As far as Prestige goes, this would allow people who have been wiped out an easy way to rebuild and actually put more prestige on the map because no one would suicide troops.
As far as the instantaneous gain of troops, maybe change it so that if you buy troops, they are "Dispatched" from whatever city was selling them and it takes that long to get them.
Server 9 Expert