New soldier types.

This always seems to be one of the biggest topics in suggestions, I'm surprised it has never been implemented. Dozens of players have suggested a vast array of new troop types and Haypi has never commented on a single one of them.

It would be great if the Haypi team gave their thoughts on possible troop types or commented on others suggestions.

I personally think battling has become way too predictable. Most players know with seconds if their army is better than the attackers.

people would use coins its obvious, but it may not be widely accepted as it is change, people dont like change which means they wont want to change something as large as a new troop type which will make such a big change to battle dynamics. i do like the idea of new troops but i think pike men is better than some more seige engine type units

But the thing is that those of us who do not want to spend money on a game get weeded out b/c we simply cannot compete with the people who do. This would be a bad idea. -.-

Yeah well perhaps a entirely new building could be added for larger siege machines like cats. Doesn't make much sense to make a catapult in a barrack. Barracks should create just solider types like pikemen and archers. Perhaps another building for calvarly type troops (stables) where I each type of building (barracks, stables, and factories) has the tech for that type of troop. The skills and attributes in the general section would affect all troops but in each special type of building it would have tech stuff for that specific troop. I.e. Perhaps armor tech from leather that can be upgraded to steel plates. And for siege machines such as for catapults u can upgrade tech from stone projectiles to idk fireballs of a type. I'm completely serious and I think this would expand te versatility of the game POSSIBLY BRINGING IN/BACK PLAYERS. 

Sorry patsy but I like it the way it is. If they added pikemen I could cope with it easily enough. But 3 different building I couldn't. Most people love haypi for it's simplicity to play but the complexity required to master. What you said makes it harder to play and harder to master. For that reason I don't think this is a good idea