Old Alliances

Hello everyone, this thread is mostly for the haypi players who have been playing a while.Well anyway, I used to play haypi all the time until my phone got stolen. Now I got a new device and I can play again! But I noticed what a mess alliances are now. I hate how basicly its what alliance has been around longer and had more donations. The old alliance system people would actually fight each other to win members and such. Now all it is, is people fighting over a mine with their armies they received over time or by donations. I suggest we go back to the original alliance system with ranking of the total number of prestige points.

I think we should keep donations and alliance armies but alliance armies can only attack other alliance armies of their level.

I just realized that this was in the (READ BEFORE POSTING ) THREAD. But if they know we want it changed back then why would they not change it?

I just realized that this was in the (READ BEFORE POSTING ) THREAD. But if they know we want it changed back then why would they not change it?

(Please use the "edit" button [bottom right of your post] in the future instead of double posting. ;) )

Just because a few players support an idea does not mean that Haypi deems it worth their efforts (or favorable) to implement. What happens to the game is solely up to them; this section of the forums is called "Suggestions," not "Guaranteed Updates." :P

Lastly, the addition you suggest would be problematic, because all the high level alliances could take the mines, preventing low levels from getting them, or vice versa.

That's why I said remove the mines and make it so the alliances still have armies, just it's only for attacking other alliances with.

my pod is still broken...I wonder if Crackdown is still going...
I havn't played for like 13 months or something.

That's why I said remove the mines and make it so the alliances still have armies, just it's only for attacking other alliances with.

How would one alliance attack another alliance if the other alliance isn't occupying anything? It would destroy any fun in alliance wars.

they had alliance wars before the whole mines thing

they had alliance wars before the whole mines thing

Yes, and those were all the members individually attacking other members. It was more of a player 1v1, now its an alliance 1v1.

There is no reason for them to switch back to the old system, and frankly, most players like/enjoy the new system.

Now, alliance wars without mines, I see a big problem. If mines go, there is no source of alliance prestige .-.

they had alliance wars before the whole mines thing

Yes, and those were all the members individually attacking other members. It was more of a player 1v1, now its an alliance 1v1.

There is no reason for them to switch back to the old system, and frankly, most players like/enjoy the new system.

Now, alliance wars without mines, I see a big problem. If mines go, there is no source of alliance prestige .-.

(Note: he was saying alliance 1vs.1, individual 1vs.1 will always exist.)
Alliances would be able to get prestige from battles, but as I said, it would destroy all the fun in alliance 1vs.1 wars.

That's why I said remove the mines and make it so the alliances still have armies, just it's only for attacking other alliances with.

If there was absolutely no benefit to donating and building an army as an alliance (no prestige reward for ranking system) why would an alliance even bother building one?

I'm not completely against this but more because it would allow different alliances to have different focuses. You get to choose whether you want to focus on the alliance or the individual pp sort of thing and if you have both ranking systems both styles of play are recognized.