FAQ  •  Register  •  Login

Alliance Rankings - as before mines

<<

Hanzou

User avatar

Newbie

Posts: 7

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:38 pm

Location: United Kingdom

Post Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:32 pm

Alliance Rankings - as before mines

This thread is not about whether mines are a good or bad feature but that there should be a return to alliance rankings based on the sum prestige of individual members. As before mines.

By all means have the new rankings as well. For mines suggests most active alliance -the other most powerful. If we have one I'd rather the old formulae.

Thoughts?
"Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory in the attack." - Sun Tzu
<<

Heathryn

User avatar

Newbie

Posts: 11

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 4:00 pm

Post Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:11 pm

Re: Alliance Rankings - as before mines

I agree with this. The only 3 ranks we really need are alliance (based on prestige), Prestige (individual) and mines. A person can now be in an alliance by themselves and be ranked number 1. The mine rankings have made it useless to be in an alliance.
<<

Luna.

Newbie

Posts: 5

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:05 am

Post Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:57 pm

Re: Alliance Rankings - as before mines

I agree, I think both prestige and mine rankings should be shown..
<<

Bucky1349

Newbie

Posts: 10

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:14 am

Post Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:22 am

Re: Alliance Rankings - as before mines

Please Haypi !!

Listen to your customers !!

Bring back alliance rankings by Member Prestige.

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.