Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:29 am
Alliance ranking.
There has been loads of complaints about the new alliance ranking and mines ect.
My idea is that if haypi arnt going to get rid of mines (which they probably won't) they should bring back the old alliance ranking aswell.
This way people that choose not to take part in the alliance war can still be a highly ranked alliance and get active members.
Lots of people prefer the old one as it shows the time, effort and money players have put in to there own account.
Haypi could easily replace the "title" leader board with another alliance one. (it's the same as the player prestige one anyway)
Please comment on wether this is a good or bad idea and suggest yourown.
Idea 2: add the ability to elect to change leaders somehow. Currently if the leader of an alliance goes inactive or he loses/breaks his/her device the alliance can be stuck with a mine with zero output. Also there is no way for all the members to elect a new leader and leave making a new alliance as it would be horribly far behind.
My idea is that if haypi arnt going to get rid of mines (which they probably won't) they should bring back the old alliance ranking aswell.
This way people that choose not to take part in the alliance war can still be a highly ranked alliance and get active members.
Lots of people prefer the old one as it shows the time, effort and money players have put in to there own account.
Haypi could easily replace the "title" leader board with another alliance one. (it's the same as the player prestige one anyway)
Please comment on wether this is a good or bad idea and suggest yourown.
Idea 2: add the ability to elect to change leaders somehow. Currently if the leader of an alliance goes inactive or he loses/breaks his/her device the alliance can be stuck with a mine with zero output. Also there is no way for all the members to elect a new leader and leave making a new alliance as it would be horribly far behind.
Last edited by Lordewan on Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
