Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:31 pm by Kelso17
I actually quoted many people because I wanted to respond to everyone in one post rather than many. I was attempting forum ettiquite,
After all, something that happens constantly is worse
than something that happens once.
Without question there is absolutely no one who has received more benefit by exploiting other glitches for months than the people did who maxed their warehouse with lv4 chests. Don't tell me I don't have an argument if they can't even be compared. This disaster is completely on another level.
I'll give examples.
When they changed honor from 10 to 15 they also fixed the DC glitch. Hence why I said 10 honor. To reflect the reward when it was happening. The 10 honor gained from a successful DC glitch is/was so minute, that it did not amount to anything assuming they used it for actually purchasing items. They did not have eggs the entire time people were exploiting the DC win in PVP.
But in this case I'll humor it, lets pretend it's still happening. Let's say people who glitched pvp, have played for a total of 1 hour a day @ 30 second turn around. Let's also say for every 5 DC's they glitched honor once and gained their illustrious 10 honor. (Make this 15 if you really want to account for the last month.)
120 matches a day @ 20% success is 24 DC wins. 240 DC honor per day, times that by 290 days (dating back to december 1st) is 69,600 DC honor. The equivalent of 139 level 1 stones. People with 16 warehouse slots (The number of slots needed for 139 stones) got 139 lv4 stones in 1 hour. The equivalent of 3,753 level 1 stones or 1,876,500 honor. The equivalent of winning 187,650 PVP matches which would take 5 and a half hours per day since December 1st if you win every time. To try compare the DC glitch to the chest glitch is a stretch.. but,
After all, something that happens constantly is worse than something that happens once.
The only people who do not use the ice rain glitch are people who don't know it, or haven't had the chance to. It doesn't matter if you did it once, or 1,000 times. Don't try justify that it's okay only because someone hasn't had as many opportunities as others.
I won't mention that the ice rain glitch was actually included in the comparative glitch argument to the lv4 chest glitch. Do I really need to re-calculate the above argument using honor gained from the ice rain glitch?
After all, something that happens constantly is worse than something
that happens once.
Really,
Every parent who let their kids play should be banned.
Every friend who let their friends play should be banned.
Every wife/husband/gf/bf who let their significant other play should be banned.
Ultimately meaning, every referral this game has ever received should be banned. God forbid they ban everyone at a get together who downloads the game at the same time.
Growing your consumer base by getting referral after referral because you do something that many people like and want to be part of it is how business works. It's how this game evolves. It's how this game survives. It's how YOU can still play this game. How much fun would you have playing with yourself?
After all, something that happens constantly is worse than something
that happens once.
In my opinion, players can only do so much with silver that isn't time restricted. To myself, there's no benefit, but hey if a player needs silver, buy them and sell them all. Get all the silver they want. Roll in it. Make a mess. Use it for 4 hour training a few times a day. Whatever floats their boat. Players see this glitch as valuable in different ways.
You would have the chance to get YOUR value out.
Now, onto your personal attack.
To answer your question, my argument has been the same simple argument from the beginning. This glitch has tilted the game (especially pvp) in such dramatic fashion, no active glitches can compare and
something of equal benefit to all players needs to happen in order to regain it's equilibrium, even if haypi takes a loss one way or another. It's lose a little now, or lose a lot later. All I know is that I'm glad it's not me on the other end making the decision.
I'm sorry you had to take this to a personal level. I commented on everything I read up to that was against my idea or against a solution of giving everyone something of equal value. It was by chance I pointed out that some of the comparisons you made were irrelevant, but this has given me a chance to elaborate why. Nothing you said made someone who agreed with me disagree.
You have one person who agrees with you - and I enjoyed reading their post because their English is as good as Haypi's.
As far as my argument is concerned, you've allowed me to fill the voids with reason. If you're going to comment on this again with your thoughts or opinions, argue with what is said not with me. You will lose.
