A different kind of pvp suggestion

I think it would be awesome to have 1v1, 2v2, 3v3, and 4v4 in terms of monsters. Like you would be able to pick how many monsters you want to have battle. It would definitely add strategy and variety to pvp rather than everyone using 4 oels and running over the less fortunate epic and free legendaries.

Of course this would thin out the pvp playing field, so a pvp (not total server) merge would be necessary. I really have no idea how that hasn't been implemented yet anyway, we've been asking for it since basically day one. They did it with hd so we know it's possible.

These two together would revive pvp-dead servers and cause a huge burst in pvp, while at the same time not causing too much pvp traffic since it'll be split between 4 different types of 1v1, dual duel, and 2v2.

[Koenaj]

I like the different idea, but I doubt it'll do any good.
1V1 would just get more users of Jihadi monsters with Potions.
2V2 would be nice, altough it's easily exploitable by using Jihadi + Ghost.
3V3 would be great, no comment about that.

Ofcourse, you can use Jihadi at 4v4 aswell, but atleast you have SOME chance because you might get lucky dodging an attack, something that would get a lot harder at 1V1 battles.

I like the different idea, but I doubt it'll do any good.
1V1 would just get more users of Jihadi monsters with Potions.
2V2 would be nice, altough it's easily exploitable by using Jihadi + Ghost.
3V3 would be great, no comment about that.

Ofcourse, you can use Jihadi at 4v4 aswell, but atleast you have SOME chance because you might get lucky dodging an attack, something that would get a lot harder at 1V1 battles.

That's actually why it would add more strategy. A shun pewg would be an automatic win against those teams, and thorn would give you a tie. There's always a counter to 1 monster or a 2 monster combo.

On a side note, potions need to be removed regardless of this suggestion.

[Koenaj]

That's actually why it would add more strategy. A shun pewg would be an automatic win against those teams, and thorn would give you a tie. There's always a counter to 1 monster or a 2 monster combo.

On a side note, potions need to be removed regardless of this suggestion.

Yea, I can see what you mean, altough it'd pretty much become a gamble of who uses Shun, and who uses Jihadi.
And once again, I can't agree more with the fact that potions should be removed ...

I honestly don't think jihadi scythes would be a problem, they're way too risky. It's an automatic loss against any shun pewg, meniss, verte, foresight, etc. They would definitely need to add a counter to pressure, I think that would be the most abused trend.

[Koenaj]

I honestly don't think jihadi scythes would be a problem, they're way too risky. It's an automatic loss against any shun pewg, meniss, verte, foresight, etc. They would definitely need to add a counter to pressure, I think that would be the most abused trend.

True that.
Ohwell, lets wait what other peeps think, I could see how this turns out as a nice idea, but it has some leaks.

4v4 is too much , marty and gg
but instead , a good idea in my opinion would be a FFA 1v1v1 or something like this , but with dead pvp servers , again i suggest , to merge servers in pvp