Rankings and new competition

A ranking system for all the alliances and players from all the servers would be cool. And a pvp for alliances would be awesome. Alliances would sign up in the competition and donate troops to one of their members who will represent that alliance. The players from different alliances then battle and last one standing wins. Based off of troop donations to that player, the rest of the alliance will get rewards if they come in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. This would be a great way to boost member involvement in an alliance. A great way to bring more excitement into the game. What does anyone else think?

Good idea but needs refinement: as in a fair way to do that as in a 5000 troop limit and maybe a crop limit. As all lvl players would be able to be a rep for their ally those would make sense as an alliance with all lvl 6-7 and they battle and alliance with lvl 10-12 the latter wouldn't have an unfair advantage over the other alliance.

Yes you are right. Number 1 alliance against a much weaker one isn't fair. But this was only a rough idea. If it catches on I might add on some more suggestions to improve it. A limit on number of each unit perhaps?

Yes. Say like maybe 1000 of each maybe 500 for a total of 2000? That or catagorize it as in: inf) say 750 cav) say 500 arch) notnused usually bc they suck but like 250? And cats) say 500?

That's still a total of 2000 so it wouldn't be unfair witha whole alliance working towards it

Actually, there is already a prestige ranking spot that can be found on Gamcenter. You would go to Games > Haypi kingdom > Leaderboards> Rank of Prestige.

Also, with your alliance idea, it's a bit confusing. You said the last one standing, when there isn't a way to offically lose in this game. It would have to be whoever can get the most prestige (similar to PVP).
I kind of feel that this wouldn't work, because the player who is representing would have to start all over (to make sure all have a fair oppurtunity). With starting over, you mentioned about donating troops to your alliance member. How much would be donated could depend on how developed the server is to begin with which would definately give some servers many more advantages over others. Alliance wars could sound like a good idea, but I think it is much to similar to how PVP already is, and not to mention, a lot more work and confusion.

Actually last one standing makes sense if u get a set # of troops and u run out u wouldn't be able to attack anymore and considered "out" the last one standing would be the person with troops remaining. Just a suggestion because alot of things are similar to pvp and this would be different.

Also this would, I think, be within each server not as an outside server like pvp so server development wouldn't matter.

Actually last one standing makes sense if u get a set # of troops and u run out u wouldn't be able to attack anymore and considered "out" the last one standing would be the person with troops remaining. Just a suggestion because alot of things are similar to pvp and this would be different.

People could simply hunt their troops, and stay in the competition. You couldn't exactly run out. People could attack with all and hunt one..

Yah I forgot about hunt... That feature could be disabled for the representative tho so 1) the whole ally isn't punished for hunts 2) it would then make it fair. I agree it would be alot of work but a great prospect for upcoming updates as alot of Ppl would do it.