Lose a branch lose the press

Ty warrior my point

Hey I guess it does make sense. With a couple of changes it would be a good part of this game.

I think of it this way, prestige is like experience, and as you gain more you start to become more familiar with the game. . .building up a city gives 'experience', and if the city is stolen, the experience your general gained cant really be stolen as well. . .i almost see it as your people becoming more knowledgeable from building, and just because what they worked on was stolen....doesn't mean they forgot how to do it haha that prob makes no sense but im tired right now:) so again im not sure what to think. . .this idea would certainly change up the game a bit, its interesting

Not at all, that makes a lot of sense.
I have always described prestige as experience to newer players.

However, prestige seems to be the only valuable thing once you reach level 14+. I mean ONLY valuable thing. Resources are easy to come by... money too.

No it isn't because of makin u defend ur city it's just u could lose all ur prestige and people would quit

Steeler what lv are you?

And If. Try I can complety build a city frorm scrach to max in less then a weak it's easy if you know how

The only problem with this is if you have a king of king bullying a 3rd marquis. There should be a rule so this can't be abused. Maybe making it so closer levels can do it, but not something like 14 to 9.

Do you not understand it can't be abused

one to gain a city you must have a city slot

two ways of gaining a city
1. Lv title (1 city slot)
2. Lose a city (meens you lose the press of that city and if you claim another you might be back at ground zero on press I lose or gain)

how will this be abused ? If you will lose press by a hostile takeover it isn't like one player can take a city by it self it takes. Two people and lose all ur cities it will take two people per city( liment 5 atks a day )(meening each battle u lose u lose 10 loyalty, but ifyou defend agaist just one atk and win it will take 3 players to take take that branch)

Yup makes perfect sense.

The winner should gain some pres for taking the city, but not the amount of pres the city is worth (because owner got that pres building the city).

Not getting any pres for taking a city (how things currently work) is pants because it means there's no point defending a city. If you got pres from taking a city, I think more people would defend them and overall make game more interesting.