rules!

Well then same thank you for agreeing with me.

Sameh you're real good at contributing negative comments. Not every player is out to abuse you and the system bud.

So I read like the first page of replies because I'm lazy :p

But here goes..

I believe that the rules are good as is, but could be more clear on what they're asking. Specifically rule 8. Many people bring that rule up, and I think it needs to be clarified in Vayneglory's post.

There are other rules too, maybe the spam one. Some experts may go a little overboard with that one.

But I'm sure members do also.

Umm.. I think the issue lies mostly in this within the experts chosen, some get bored and just want to mute rather than simply ask the person. The goal is to get the person willingly to stop right? Rather than having to have to resort to a mute. I'm gonna say 90% of experts are good about this, but it's all context.
But that's saved for an email to admin.

Hmm.. Uh.. I don't think we should make the rules SPECIFIC to a certain thing. Just CLEAR on what they're asking of. If we made them completely specific, people would find a way to go around them saying that's not what that rule said. But if we make them clear on the material the rule is not allowing, experts can still interpret as needed.

CLEAR not SPECIFIC




But that's just my input...


EDIT: Oh yeah. And Sameh, I don't know you, and I hate to agree with some bothersome people, but all I've seen of your posts is needless sarcasm and hidden insults. I'm sure this guy isn't "ignorant" but only voicing what he thinks should be assessed. :[ Howbout constructive criticism? ^^

[Sameh]

Negative posts are much more useful than positive ones.

So I read like the first page of replies because I'm lazy :p

But here goes..

I believe that the rules are good as is, but could be more clear on what they're asking. Specifically rule 8. Many people bring that rule up, and I think it needs to be clarified in Vayneglory's post.

There are other rules too, maybe the spam one. Some experts may go a little overboard with that one.

But I'm sure members do also.

Umm.. I think the issue lies mostly in this within the experts chosen, some get bored and just want to mute rather than simply ask the person. The goal is to get the person willingly to stop right? Rather than having to have to resort to a mute. I'm gonna say 90% of experts are good about this, but it's all context.
But that's saved for an email to admin.

Hmm.. Uh.. I don't think we should make the rules SPECIFIC to a certain thing. Just CLEAR on what they're asking of. If we made them completely specific, people would find a way to go around them saying that's not what that rule said. But if we make them clear on the material the rule is not allowing, experts can still interpret as needed.

CLEAR not SPECIFIC




But that's just my input...


EDIT: Oh yeah. And Sameh, I don't know you, and I hate to agree with some bothersome people, but all I've seen of your posts is needless sarcasm and hidden insults. I'm sure this guy isn't "ignorant" but only voicing what he thinks should be assessed. :[ Howbout constructive criticism? ^^

Hmm, you may be right. But if they want to make a rule to ban, say, the fail whale. They need to be specific. If they don't, that's fine.

[redgun]

Elephant rules

Updated rule 8 just for Fey >.>...

Experts have rules to follow we don't make our own. Find an Expert causing problems and making up rules (like alliance ads are not allowed to be more than 5 lines) and they'll be dealt with.

So I read like the first page of replies because I'm lazy :p

But here goes..

I believe that the rules are good as is, but could be more clear on what they're asking. Specifically rule 8. Many people bring that rule up, and I think it needs to be clarified in Vayneglory's post.

There are other rules too, maybe the spam one. Some experts may go a little overboard with that one.

But I'm sure members do also.

Umm.. I think the issue lies mostly in this within the experts chosen, some get bored and just want to mute rather than simply ask the person. The goal is to get the person willingly to stop right? Rather than having to have to resort to a mute. I'm gonna say 90% of experts are good about this, but it's all context.
But that's saved for an email to admin.

Hmm.. Uh.. I don't think we should make the rules SPECIFIC to a certain thing. Just CLEAR on what they're asking of. If we made them completely specific, people would find a way to go around them saying that's not what that rule said. But if we make them clear on the material the rule is not allowing, experts can still interpret as needed.

CLEAR not SPECIFIC




But that's just my input...


EDIT: Oh yeah. And Sameh, I don't know you, and I hate to agree with some bothersome people, but all I've seen of your posts is needless sarcasm and hidden insults. I'm sure this guy isn't "ignorant" but only voicing what he thinks should be assessed. :[ Howbout constructive criticism? ^^

Thought you said you were lazy.