FAQ  •  Register  •  Login

implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

<<

Night-Mayr

Marquis

Posts: 339

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 7:19 pm

Location: united states FL

Post Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:17 pm

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

i can say i extreamly dislike this idea for this reason. im lvl 16 and i scout lvls 11+ now y for one reaosn prestiege. if its 20k- i attack from main city if more i teleport now if people dont have prestiege i move on moral of story dont leave units out...
im backish i quit the main game atm slowly comeing back forum is a start XD
<<

Kcmathews

Marquis

Posts: 333

Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:28 pm

Post Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

I think there should be a Cap Range.
The range should be as follows:
Minimum lvl you can attack is someone half your level, rounded up.
Maximum lvl you can attack is twice your level.
This would mean that once you hit lvl 10, you are fair game to everyone above you.
This would also prevent low lvl alt accounts from pinning people.
Server 9 Expert
<<

-Ulysses-

Newbie

Posts: 21

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:16 pm

Post Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:02 pm

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

Jesusaddic wrote:No I wasn't talking to u jus saying anytime I attack a lower lvl I got a letter full of cuss words. Besides ur not going to get into top 50 (or at least stay in top 50) if u don't buy coins anyways so I really don't see the point of having a cap. I started it a server with lvl 7-10 around me. I made truces n did wut I sed above it works.


so what you're saying is if new players play this game for competitive play they should just quit because there is no hope in reaching the top. I like the coin system but im sorry this game isnt worth 20 dollars on a weekly basis to establish my self against the die hards. without the capthe die hard fans will keep their dominance because they have more time invested.
if the cap is in place it forces die hards to battle die hards and the people who check in once in awhile to battle amongst themselves. a game should appeal to all varieties of players not just the veterans.
<<

Bahpben

User avatar

Veteran

Posts: 662

Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:30 pm

Location: DA VILLE

Post Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:54 pm

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

-Ulysses- wrote:
Jesusaddic wrote:No I wasn't talking to u jus saying anytime I attack a lower lvl I got a letter full of cuss words. Besides ur not going to get into top 50 (or at least stay in top 50) if u don't buy coins anyways so I really don't see the point of having a cap. I started it a server with lvl 7-10 around me. I made truces n did wut I sed above it works.


so what you're saying is if new players play this game for competitive play they should just quit because there is no hope in reaching the top. I like the coin system but im sorry this game isnt worth 20 dollars on a weekly basis to establish my self against the die hards. without the capthe die hard fans will keep their dominance because they have more time invested.
if the cap is in place it forces die hards to battle die hards and the people who check in once in awhile to battle amongst themselves. a game should appeal to all varieties of players not just the veterans.
Aww cause if u were on s3 I would have given them a little attitude check. ;) Hide resources In market hunt troops join alliance and send friendly letter as I stated at the beginning of this forum.
Image
<<

Chris33

Beginner

Posts: 57

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:42 pm

Post Tue Sep 14, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

I really don't think a limit on who can attack whom is necessary. For everyone who does, are you really getting attacked that often from higher level players? If so, it can only be because 1) you are leving troops in your base (if this is the case...STOP IT...) or 2) you have a high accumulation of resources (if this is the case....USE THEM....). Sorry for the yelling...got a little excited I guess. Now if anyone is attacking you and you don't have troops in your base and you don't have resources, then they just plain don't like you. If this is the case, send them a letter as suggested by so many above. If that doesn't work, then relentlessly take and resign their oasis and forts and don't stop until they beg you to stop. Now while doing this, make absolutely sure you have no troops or resources in your base because they will be attacking you out of frustration, but if you have nothing in your base, they get nothing and you can just laugh laugh laugh at them. Also, if they start trying to defend their forts and oasis by leaving troops in them, call it out on wc and I guarantee someone else will take care of them for you. Everyone is always looking for more prestige and occupied forts and oasis are the best because there will be no traps/turrets. If anyone does this, I guarantee these players will stop attacking you.

Now if you guys are actually just upset because you lost a lot of troops to a high level player because you forgot to send your troops on a hunt, just know that it happens to everyone in the beginning. Happened to me too when I started, but now I learned my lesson, played smarter, and am now a level 16.

Finally, you don't need coins to be a top player. As I said, I am a level 16 (very soon to be 17) and am ranked at about 73 right now and am working my way up the ladder and I have NEVER bought coins EVER. Just saying, if you play smart, coins aren't a necessity. Definitely a help (a major help), but not a necessity. I don't think I will ever be in the top 10 or anything without coins, but the top 50 is definitely doable.
<<

Jesusaddic

Baron

Posts: 286

Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:15 pm

Post Tue Sep 14, 2010 9:02 pm

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

I didn't mean that it's not Likely to b a high lvl I mean it is very diffacult to b in top 50 if u don't spend coins
The mind is like a parachute it only functions when open
  
Having a smoking section in a resteraunt is the same as having a peeing section in a pool.
<<

Bahpben

User avatar

Veteran

Posts: 662

Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:30 pm

Location: DA VILLE

Post Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

Thats what everyone thinks. As stated by Chris, you can do EVERYTHING without coins you that you can do with them. It just takes longer.
Image
<<

Kaydoubleu

Beginner

Posts: 32

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:35 am

Post Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:19 am

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

the dynamics of this game is focused on spending money to buy coins. with a cap it would force the no lifers to attack each other and your average players to battle each other. there definately is a plateau affect when you first start off and no matter how many precautions is taken you will be pillaged by an already established player one form or another whether is wasting you population to hide resources in the market,trying to accumulate enough resources to actually upgrade builds or train troops only to have it taken by a high level who plays non stop, losing an oasis that took half your troops only to have a player double your level strip it from your grasps. all this and throw in the world chat nazis that constantly bicker and take out of context every single phrase that is said makes the game not worth the time nor effort. i will be submitting a negative review on this game to hinder others from even bothering. As for everyone who negatively commented on the suggestion i can only insinuate that you dont want your precious farms being stripped from you maintaining your dominance. Its not an issue of being a bad sport, its an issue of keeping the people who have time invested in the game, who most likely buy coins on a regular basis, happy. Yes it seems this thread as gone in favor against the cap but always remember the inactive outnumber the active players. Thus proving this game has failed to please the majority.
<<

Bahpben

User avatar

Veteran

Posts: 662

Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:30 pm

Location: DA VILLE

Post Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:18 am

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

You obviously aren't getting the memo. 28/30 of the people I know that have quit quit because they were bored. 1 quit because lack of progression and another quit because he left his troops out. Attacking people does nothing if you have nothing at your base and I've lot over 100k prestige to higher lvls. 50k when I was below lvl 10, but that adds experience, excitement, and revenge to the game, which many people don't realize. It seems you took chris's post and just tried to make it un legit. I run an alliance for lower lvls. Chris is vice. I deal with these problems everyday. So go write up your bad app review. Quit. It's one thing to suggest strongly or provide creative criticism(couldn't think of the real word), but it seems that you are now trying to discreetly blackmail? Saying implement this or I write a bad app review and quit.
Image
<<

-Ulysses-

Newbie

Posts: 21

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:16 pm

Post Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:16 am

Re: implent a cap on declaring war on lower lvls

Bahpben wrote:You obviously aren't getting the memo. 28/30 of the people I know that have quit quit because they were bored. 1 quit because lack of progression and another quit because he left his troops out. Attacking people does nothing if you have nothing at your base and I've lot over 100k prestige to higher lvls. 50k when I was below lvl 10, but that adds experience, excitement, and revenge to the game, which many people don't realize. It seems you took chris's post and just tried to make it un legit. I run an alliance for lower lvls. Chris is vice. I deal with these problems everyday. So go write up your bad app review. Quit. It's one thing to suggest strongly or provide creative criticism(couldn't think of the real word), but it seems that you are now trying to discreetly blackmail? Saying implement this or I write a bad app review and quit.


you only furthered his arguement. You admitted people quit cause face it!!!! the odds are stacked. to even suggest he was trying to blackmail is completely ludicrous. customer reviews arent only positive he obviously had a negative experience and wants to share it with others. you sir a dense
PreviousNext

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.