recommend the coins go to defender's pocket if they withdra

Hi. When a attacker use coin to withdraw a battle, they didn't lose prestiges.
Alot of ppl recommend to penalize them and lose some prestiges because defender kills some of their troops and this is good suggestion.

Some ppl argue "they already lost 5 coins to exchange the prestiges, what more do you want from attack?" For an defender, who gives sh-it that attacker lose coins. Defender gains nothing from a withdraw battle and Haypi gains from coins from attacker. I think this is not fair for defender.

I recommend the 5 coins from the battle withdrawing go into defender's pocket instead of Haypi. THIS IS FAIR.
At least 3 coins give to defender and 2 coins go to Haypi. At least give defender something.

why?? Imagine an attack killed some of the defender's troops and withdraw the battle because defenders are able to hit the attack an d give a nice damage in the next round. Then attack withdraw the battle. Withdraw battle cause attack lose nothing but 5 coins. ATTACKER is having an advantage.

Conclusion:
attacker - lose 5 coins - maybe maybe ok.
Haypi - gain 5 coins - advantage
Defender - not fair- gain nothing from withdraw battle.,

comn on man.

Could be abused. A great way to give coins to people. Just attack and recall... So (as if my oppinion counted lol) i say not a perfect idea...

Could be abused. A great way to give coins to people. Just attack and recall... So (as if my oppinion counted lol) i say not a perfect idea...

That's good for ppl who aren't coin spender and make some coins.
Haypi can't just make all the coin.
that's why i said "defender gets 3 coins and haypi gets 2 coins"
i mean come on and give defender something in return.

Haypi should not just get everything.

Could be abused. A great way to give coins to people. Just attack and recall... So (as if my oppinion counted lol) i say not a perfect idea...

That 3 or 5 coins are usually nothing to those attacker who has money to move the city around, but it's good for non-coin spender.

Yeah it is, but it is a way to give coins to other players... Like as in a trade. Not illegal, just frowned upon... In other words, people would abuse it and it would then be a competition for #1 between coin buyers and friends of coin buyers

I'm really liking this suggestion.

Perhaps some tweaks and/or limits or criteria to meet before this becomes applicable.
Ie; Over X amount of troops on the field etc

Yes, dont get me wrong, im in full acceptance of this(im not a coin buyer) but it needs tweaking

Yeah it is, but it is a way to give coins to other players... Like as in a trade. Not illegal, just frowned upon... In other words, people would abuse it and it would then be a competition for #1 between coin buyers and friends of coin buyers

If it is a trade, the attacker can just buy a few dollar gift cards to friend and that's simple.
i understand your concern.
thank you for reply :"D

[GoldenRico]

Totally against.

1. Too easy to abuse
2. There are already ways to get free coins by downloading apps
3. Making more ways to get coins kills the market
4. I can understand getting prestige but getting coins is way too much of a gain

perhaps defender should get prestige for the amount of army that they kill minus their loss. withdrew should always remain as last option unless totally outnumbered.