i want this game more cooler

not if you had 100,000 cats defending....

True but I'll nvr have that n most ppl won't lol

I feel this would be much too complicated. When troops are lost who loses them? Don't forget about the bonuses some players have while others don't (equipment). I feel this would cause too much conflict. However, it is a good idea.

thats what we are trying to figure out. i wouldn't submit this idea, formally to haypi, before we get the issues situated. its a good enough idea in theory, i would hate to see it just die.

Well I just to send troop to help memeber that in my alli, and it really cool if we do those stuff it like real life

I once played a game where everyone fought over certain places with troops that they combined, there would be a defending party with combined troops, and a defending party with combined troops, it was a really fun game, not as good as haypi though.

its not as fun when your in the biggest alliance in haypi, because then you are no match for anyone. you just take what you want.... which we kinda do already. lol

Also we need an alliance.... treaties for allied alliances. if you get where I am going great!

-Vice Mika, Newborn
Suballiance of Reborn and Unborn the mast powerful alliances in s41

that sounds too much like a similar online game..... however, the ability to say who you want to be allied with, in an alliance letter, is genius!

Would be nice if we Haypi gave us some heads up of what their idea of alliance war will be. I've been hearing them say "it's coming" for quite some time now with absolutely no specifics.

I hope it is more than just "donating" troops so the leader can fight. That would leave me with almost as much time to kill as without that feature. I personally would prefer to control my troops.